Avoiding common pitfalls in RF component design & manufacturing

RF components are critical to high-performance systems, yet projects often fail due to material selection, thermal management, supply chain issues, and testing challenges.

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the October 2025 print edition of Aerospace Manufacturing and Design under the headline “Why RF projects fail.”

PHOTO COURTESY FILTRONIC

Successfully designing and manufacturing radio frequency (RF) components is a complex process requiring in-depth knowledge of RF fundamentals and a thorough understanding of material selection and the impact this can have on performance. Yet, despite significant investment and planning, RF projects frequently fail – often due to the following preventable issues.

Incorrect material choices. The materials used in RF components have a direct impact on RF performance and reliability. Choosing the wrong materials can result in excessive signal loss, reduced power efficiency, or failure to meet environmental requirements. For example, using materials with poor dielectric properties can lead to increased signal attenuation and performance variation over operating temperatures, while the use of inappropriate coatings can also add to signal losses and even compromise reliability in harsh environments.

Poor thermal management. RF components generate heat, and inadequate thermal management can reduce performance, causing component failure. High-power RF modules, particularly those used in telecoms and defense applications, require advanced thermal solutions such as heat spreaders, efficient printed circuit board (PCB) layout designs, and active cooling mechanisms. Failure to consider these factors early in the design process can lead to overheating and premature system failure.

Fragmented supply chains. A design house may develop the component, a contract manufacturer may handle production, and another provider may be responsible for testing. However, this multi-vendor approach can introduce miscommunications, inconsistencies, and delays. Without good collaboration between design, manufacture, and test teams, the final product may not perform as expected, requiring costly rework or even project cancellation.

When design and manufacturing are handled under one roof, potential production challenges can be identified and mitigated early. This collaborative approach ensures components are high-performing and manufacturable at scale, reducing time to market and minimizing costs.

A single-source approach also removes the complications of managing multiple suppliers. A collaborative partner ensures component sourcing, assembly, and testing are all aligned, reducing the likelihood of supply chain disruptions, component mismatches, or last-minute design modifications that could impact performance.

RF testing is a crucial yet often underestimated phase of product development. A collaborative partner will have in-house testing capabilities, ensuring performance is rigorously validated before deployment. This eliminates the risk of finding performance issues after production, which can be costly and time-consuming to fix.

By working with a single partner, customers can reduce the risk of project failure and accelerate time to market. This approach ensures high-performance RF components and enables companies to adapt to evolving technology demands with agility and confidence.

By addressing common failure points and partnering with an experienced, collaborative provider, companies can significantly improve project outcomes and achieve long-term success in the competitive RF landscape.

Filtronic
https://filtronic.com

About the author: Jerry Sanham is business development director at Filtronic, a designer and manufacturer of RF-to-mmWave components and subsystems.

October 2025
Explore the October 2025 Issue

Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.